Drawing for PARROT HILL

USPTO serial 76148132

PARROT HILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARROT HILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith W. Medansky

KEITH W MEDANSKY PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFEP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, wine, alcoholic fruit extracts, liqueurs, prepared cocktails and distilled spiritsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2003ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance