USPTO serial 76148367
SANLINK STORAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANLINK STORAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglass
JOHN TIEDGE MS 1051HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY3000 HANOVER STPALO ALTO, CA 94304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware in the nature of data storage disk arrays featuring data disk drives, tape drives and plug-in data storage subsystems comprised of computer hardware; computer hardware, namely, processors, controllers, electrical and mechanical interconnects, bus interface chips, integrated circuit chips, application-specific integrated circuits, computer network controller integrated circuits, host computer adapter boards, printed circuit boards, and electrical/electronic components thereon; computer software, namely, device drivers for operating the above computer hardware, computer network management utilities software, and user manuals sold as a unit with the above products and with the above computer software | ACTIVE | Sep 18, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |