Drawing for DEAR DANIEL

USPTO serial 76148493

DEAR DANIEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEAR DANIEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda Joy Kattwinkel

LINDA JOY KATTWINKEL OWEN WICKERSHAM ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST STE 19SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2450UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027RUBBER BATH MATS, TEXTILE DOOR MATS, PLASTIC DOOR MATS, RUBBER DOOR MATS, RUGS, PLASTIC WALL HANGINGS, AND VINYL WALL HANGINGSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 10, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 1, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 3, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 5, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 3, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance