Drawing for COVERED BRIDGE

USPTO serial 76148644

COVERED BRIDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COVERED BRIDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard L Byrne

RICHARD L BYRNE WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG436 7TH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of funeral homesACTIVEDec 3, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 7, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 7, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 7, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 21, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 23, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance