Drawing for WEBSHERIFFONLINE

USPTO serial 76148852

WEBSHERIFFONLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BEYER JR, BROOKE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBSHERIFFONLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert Dubno

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900RIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR USE IN GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKING AND RESTRICTING ACCESS TO AND BY COMPUTER NETWORKS TO AND OF UNDESIRED WEB SITES, MEDIA AND INDIVIDUALS AND FACILITIES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR FINANCIAL, SALES, PAYMENT AND DEBT TRANSACTIONS WITHOUT INTEREST CHARGING AND INTEREST PAYMENTACTIVE
036PROVIDING SERVICES AND INFORMATION FOR FINANCIAL, SALES, PAYMENT AND DEBT TRANSACTIONS WITHOUT INTEREST CHARGING AND INTEREST PAYMENT OVER GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKSACTIVE
038PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKSACTIVE
042COMPUTER SECURITY SERVICES, NAMELY, RESTRICTING ACCESS TO AND BY COMPUTER NETWORKS TO AND OF UNDESIRED WEB SITES, MEDIA AND INDIVIDUALS AND FACILITIESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 5, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 5, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 5, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance