Drawing for NEO

USPTO serial 76148914

NEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter S Dardi

PETER S DARDI PATTERSON THUENTE SKARR & CHRISTENSEN PA4800 IDS CTR80 S 8TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2100

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRO-OPTICAL COMPONENTS, NAMELY, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, CONNECTORS, ADAPTERS. FILTERS. SWITCHES, TERMINATORS, RESONATORS, LASERS, WAVEGUIDES, AND MULTIPLEXERS; OPTICAL FIBERS; OPTICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, FILTERS, SPLITTERS, MULTIPLEXERS, AND COUPLERS; OPTICAL WAVE GUIDES; OPTICAL NETWORK COMPONENTS, NAMELY, LASERS, DETECTORS, CABLES, RESONATORS, MODULATORS, CONNECTORS, SWITCHES, MULTIPLEXERS, ROUTERS, FILTERS, PHASE-SHIFTERS, AMPLIFIERS, AND SPLITTERS; AND OPTICAL COATED SUBSTRATESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 6, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 6, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 4, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Mar 8, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 5, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 5, 2004REINREINSTATED
Nov 24, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 4, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance