Drawing for DOCUSPRING

USPTO serial 76149350

DOCUSPRING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOCUSPRING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael K Bosworth

MICHAEL K BOSWORTH WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP1400 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Database management software for legal services; compact discs featuring custom document management software for the end user; computer software for use in document management for the end userACTIVE
035Document reproduction; copying of documents for othersACTIVE
036Business brokerage; brokerage in the field of legal services and softwareACTIVE
039Warehouse storage; storage of documents and objectsACTIVE
040Digital imaging services; media duplication of data and digital information; electronic storage of legal documents; electronic imaging, scanning, digitizing, alteration and retouching of documentsACTIVE
041Training in the use and operation of database management software; seminars in database management, document management and document preparationACTIVE
042litigation support services; database development services; providing on-line computer databases in the field of legal services; data conversion of computer program data and information; computer software design for others; court reporting; videotaping; legal services, including the electronic filing of court documentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 4, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance