USPTO serial 76150536
GROOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GROOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William O.Ferron, Jr.
WILLIAM O FERRON JR SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLL701 FIFTH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE WA, 98104 7092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HARDWARE CONTAINING A MICROPROCESSOR OR MICROCONTROLLER AND CONTROLLABLE BY SOFTWARE OR FIRMWARE, NAMELY, SERVERS, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, MODEMS, SCANNERS, HAND HELD COMPUTERS OR COMMUNICATORS OR PERSONAL ELECTRONIC ORGANIZERS, ROUTERS, PAGERS, TELEVISION SET TOP CABLE, SATELLITE AND WIRELESS CONVERTER BOXES, TELEPHONES, COMPUTER KEYBOARDS, AUDIO DISC, CASSETTE AND MP3 PLAYERS, AND VIDEO CASSETTE AND DVD PLAYERS; AND VIDEO CASSETTE AND DVD PLAYERS; DATA OR AUDIO OR VIDEO STORAGE MEDIA IN THE NATURE OF BLANK DISKETTES, MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS, CD-ROMS, DVDs, AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES AND CASSETTES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |