USPTO serial 76150687
IDENTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IDENTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D McDonald
ROBERT D MCDONALD MILLER THOMSON LLP2700, 10155-102 STEDMONTON, AB T5J 4G8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PRODUCT MARKER CONSISTING OF A CARRIER FLUID APPLIED TO ASSETS AND PRODUCTS IN WHICH A COMBINATION OF UNIQUE CHEMICALS OR ELEMENTS IS PRESENT, ALLOWING FOR SUBSEQUENT DETECTION, ANALYSIS AND IDENTIFICATION SPECIFIC TO EACH ASSET OR PRODUCT | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING ASSET AND PRODUCT MANAGEMENT AND LOSS PREVENTION SERVICES, NAMELY MARKING ASSETS AND PRODUCTS BY APPLYING A CARRIER FLUID IN WHICH A COMBINATION OF UNIQUE CHEMICALS OR ELEMENTS IS PRESENT, ALLOWING FOR SUBSEQUENT DETECTION, ANALYSIS AND IDENTIFICATION SPECIFIC TO EACH ASSET OR PRODUCT THROUGH THE USE OF X-RAY FLUORESCENT AND OTHER FORMS OF DETECTORS AND ANALYZERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |