USPTO serial 76150746
SHOES24 WWW.SHOES24.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHOES24 WWW.SHOES24.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
60389, Frankfurt am Main, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J Hugs
IPLO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICES IPLO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICE1901 S BASCOM AVE STE 660CAMPBELL, CA 95008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SLIPPERS, WALKING SHOES, SANDALS, BOOTS, AND BOOTS FOR SPORTS; CLOTHING, ESPECIALLY MITTENS, GLOVES, SCARVES, SHIRTS, TROUSERS, JACKETS, NECKTIES, UNDERWEAR, COATS, OVERALLS, PULLOVERS, SKIRTS, COLLAR PROTECTORS, SHAWLS, PAJAMAS, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, TIGHTS, T-SHIRTS, AND WAISTCOATS; HEADGEAR FOR WEAR, ESPECIALLY HATS, AND CAPS; BELTS; INNER SOLES; SOLES FOR FOOTWEAR; HEELS; NON-SLIPPING DEVICES FOR FOOTWEAR; FITTING FOR FOOTWEAR; HEELPIECES FOR FOOTWEAR; SPATS; GALOSHES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |