USPTO serial 76150801
THE BLACKSTONE LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BLACKSTONE LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT S PHILLIPS
BRETT B HARVEY ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND15333 N PIMA RD STE 165SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ATTORNEY REFERRALS | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1999 |
| 036 | FUND RAISING (CHARITABLE) | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Aug 1, 1999 |
| 042 | ATTORNEY SERVICES, LEGAL RESEARCH, LEGAL SERVICES, AWARENESS OF THE NEEDS FOR THE LEGAL DEFENSE AND ADVOCACY OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM/LIBERTIES, THE SANCTITY OF LIFE AND FAMILY VALUES THOROUGH STRATEGIC PLANNING AND COORDINATION, TRAINING AND FUNDING FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Aug 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |