USPTO serial 76151021
ELECTRICALLY FORMULATED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 29, 2003
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ELECTRICALLY FORMULATED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WOODLAND HILLS, CA
WOODLAND HILLS, CA
Bellevue, WA
Bellevue, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIA CRIMI SPETH, ESQ.
MARIA CRIMI SPETH, ESQ. JABURG & WILK, P.C.3200 North Central AvenueSuite 2000PHOENIX, AZ 85012Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTRIC BODY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTRIC BODY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Health & Integrity Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Health & Integrity Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ELECTRICALLY FORMULATED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |