Drawing for ELIPVA

USPTO serial 76151253

ELIPVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELIPVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William E. Marames

WILLIAM E MARAMES ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035computerized data-base management; computerized data processing; computerized business information storage and retrieval; business management and organization; writing or preparation of business reports; business or market surveys; computerized on-line ordering services in the field of general consumer and commercial merchandise; consultation and advisory services in relation to all the aboveACTIVE
038communication services between computers; electronic communication services by means of a global computer network and by means of local area computer networks; telephone communication services; delivery of messages by electronic media; electronic mail services; facsimile communication services; rental of telecommunication equipment; computer network access services, namely providing multi-user access to a global computer information network; computer aided transmission of messages and images; and wireless communication servicesACTIVE
042design of web pages; commercial art and layout design services; design of computer software; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; leasing of database space; rental of computer software; rental of data processors; computer services, namely, development and management of web sites on a global computer network for others, hosting and management of Internet, extranet and global computer network services for others, consultation services in the field of a global computer network; design of computerized formats for reports and surveys; communication consultation services; consultancy and advisory services in relation to all the aboveACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance