USPTO serial 76151941
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa Georges
MELISSA GEORGES C/O FRANKFURT GARBUS KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use with accessing global communication networks and receiving electronic messaging for use with mobile communication devices; computer software for use in a management system, which software is used for project management, document management, requirements management, defect and issue tracking, time and expense tracking, project economics and cost estimation, development process guidance through best practices and methodology support, user-customizable reporting, user-customizable workflow, web chat and virtual meeting support, project metrics, source code management, contact management, project RFP, Request for Proposal, project and resource marketplace and automated testing for use in process control and monitoring for complex projects; computer software for use in a best practices management framework, which software is used to test and validate the functionality and performance of software applications to improve software development and methodologies, namely project management, document management, requirements management, defect and issue tracking, time and expense tracking, project economics and cost estimation, development process guidance through best practices and methodology support, user-customizable reporting, user-customizable workflow, web chat and virtual meeting support, project metrics, source code management, contact management, project RFP, Request for Proposal, project and resource marketplace and automated testing; computer software for the automation of business processes, namely project management, document management, requirements management, defect and issue tracking, time and expense tracking, project economics and cost estimation, development process guidance through best practices and methodology support, user-customizable reporting, user-customizable workflow, web chat and virtual meeting support, project metrics, source code management, contact management, project RFP, Request for Proposal, project and resource marketplace and automated testing; computer software to aid in the gathering, storage, categorization and analysis of data for real-time monitoring of entertainment, news, commerce, education, electronic commerce, industrial automation, supply chain management, customer relationship management, human resource management, personnel recruiting, science, medicine, government, non-profit organizations, real estate, self-improvement and reference materials; computer software for use in supporting other software, which software is used for performance monitoring and improvement, fault tolerance, backup and recovery, system configuration, transaction configuration and monitoring, security configuration and monitoring of content creation and distribution for use in interactive and web-based media applications for entertainment, news, commerce, education, industrial automation, supply chain management, customer relationship management, human resource management, personnel recruiting, science, medicine, government, non-profit organizations, real estate, self-improvement and reference materials; computer software for use in creating an interactive forum to facilitate interest in on-line business and markets | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |