USPTO serial 76151974
IT'S A MIRACLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IT'S A MIRACLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duane Morris
1667 K ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL KEY CHAINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | CALENDARS, GIFT WRAP, NOTE CARDS, STICKERS, POSTERS, JOURNALS, STATIONERY, GREETING CARDS, MEMO BOARDS, GIFT BAGS, GIFT TAGS, BOOK MARKS, AND DESK ACCESSORIES, NAMELY PENS, PENCILS, NOTE PADS, PLANNERS AND PAPER WEIGHTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | COFFEE MUGS AND TEAPOTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | WEARING APPAREL USED TO PROMOTE A TELEVISION SERIES, NAMELY TEE SHIRTS, BASEBALL CAPS, JACKETS, SCARVES, SWEATERS, SWEATSHIRTS, AND SLEEPWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Paxson Productions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Paxson Productions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named IT'S A MIRACLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |