Drawing for REWOOD

USPTO serial 76152183

REWOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMPKINS, TRICIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REWOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger D Taylor

ROGER D TAYLOR FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metallic building material, namely, sidings of metal, window sashes, windows, doors, bay windows, ceiling boards, boards of metal for building, curtain walls, fences, gates, closure fixtures for doors, namely, door bolts, door closures, sash fasteners of metal for windows and window casement bolts, casement windows of metal, door frames, door handles, door closures, roofing materials, namely, roofing panels, window shutters, locks for metal for bags, sash fasteners of metal for windowsACTIVE
019Nonmetallic building materials, namely, synthetic boards, ceiling boards, stone for buildings, window glass for buildings, window sashes, panels for buildings, casement windows, windows, door frames, fences, gates, roof coverings, door panels, doors, balustrade, marble, plaster, plywoodACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 8, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 7, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 1, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 13, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 8, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance