USPTO serial 76152352
SPECTER OFF-ROAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPECTER OFF-ROAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary Schnittgrund
GARY SCHNITTGRUND LAW OFFICES OF GARY SCHNITTGRUND28001 SMYTH DR STE 105VALENCIA, CA 91355-4030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | NEW AND USED AUTOMOBILE AND TRUCK ENGINE PARTS, NAMELY ALTERNATORS, CARBURETORS, DISTRIBUTORS, ELECTRONIC IGNITIONS; NEW AND USED AUTOMOBILE AND TRUCK EXHAUST PIPES | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | NEW AND USED AUTOMOBILE AND TRUCK ENGINES; NEW AND USED AUTOMOBILE AND TRUCK STRUCTURAL PARTS, NAMELY, BUMPER, BODY PARTS, AXLES, BRAKE LININGS, BRAKE PADS, CLUTCHES, MUD GUARDS, VEHICLE SEAT COVERS, FITTED COVERS FOR VEHICLES, SEMI-FITTED COVERS FOR VEHICLES, BIKINI TOPS, AND SEATS | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |