Drawing for KNOWLEDGEBOX FAMILY

USPTO serial 76152555

KNOWLEDGEBOX FAMILY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KNOWLEDGEBOX FAMILY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. DeVoe

DANIEL J DEVOE NCS PEARSON INC5601 GREEN VALLEY DRBLOOMINGTON, MN 55437UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software designed to enable broadband information distribution and delivery to remote playback appliances, namely, computers, televisions, personal digital assistants, wireless telephones, paging devices, wireless messaging devices, and computer hardware, namely, Internet appliances, for use in public, private, commercial and noncommercial places of education, namely, in the fields of elementary and secondary education, adult education, post-secondary education, and home education; computer software and electronic media, namely, digital video, digital audio, and electronic text and graphics featuring information in the fields of education, industry, business, news, and other topics of general consumer interest, all for use in broadband information distribution and distance learning in the fields of education, industry, business, news, finance, and other topics of general consumer interestACTIVE
042Computer software design for others to enable broadband information distribution in the fields of elementary and secondary education, adult education, post-secondary education, and home education; technical consultation regarding computer software for broadband information distribution in a wide variety of fields pertaining to education, industry, business, news, finance, lifestyle and other topics of general consumer interestACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Mar 24, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Mar 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 28, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 28, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 1, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 8, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 30, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 30, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 1, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 1, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance