USPTO serial 76153568
Q!TELEVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Q!TELEVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M4T 1Y1, CA
Toronto, Ontario, M4T 1Y1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda M Byrne
LINDA M BYRNE CRAWFORD MAUNU PLLC1270 NORTHLAND DR STE 390SAINT PAUL, MN 55120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | production and distribution of television programs; and entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing series of shows featuring commentary, news, arts, fashion, lifestyle, sports, music and/or performances through the mediums of television, satellite, computer, telephone, electronic mail, radio, audio, and video media and/or the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 15, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 15, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |