USPTO serial 76153763
MUCHPOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUCHPOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda M Byrne
LINDA M BYRNE CRAWFORD MAUNU PLLC1270 NORTHLAND DR STE 390SAINT PAUL, MN 55120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | production and distribution of television programs; and entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing series of shows featuring commentary, news, arts, fashion, lifestyle, sports, music and/or performances through the mediums of television, satellite, computer, telephone, electronic mail, radio, audio, and video media and/or the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |