USPTO serial 76154065
GLOBAL ID TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBAL ID TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-1701 Fribourg, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES A OLIFF
JAMES A OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGE PLCP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed matter, namely, brochures, pamphlets, magazines and leaflets in the field of identification systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | organizing and conducting fairs, congresses and exhibitions for advertising purposes in the field of identification systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | organizing and conducting fairs, congresses and exhibitions for cultural and educational purposes in the field of identification systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |