USPTO serial 76154400
OPTO SPEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTO SPEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mezzovico-Vira, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERLA M. KUHN
PERLA M KUHN HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLPONE BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, computer hardware, semiconductors, microprocessors, integrated circuits, microcomputers; computer hardware for recording, processing, receiving, reproducing, transmitting, modifying, compressing, decompressing, broadcasting, merging or enhancing of data; electronic, electrotechnical and optoelectronical parts, namely data processors, integrated circuits, electrical connectors for use in data processing and data transmission; all for use in the fields of telecommunications, in the test equipment for medical application and for optical measurements, in the fields of computer networking and data communication networking, in the fields of avionics and satellite | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |