Drawing for THAI FRESH

USPTO serial 76154732

THAI FRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THAI FRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas E White

JEFFREY A O'CONNELL SHARTSIS, FRIESE & GINSBURG LLPONE MARITIME PLZ 18TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029processed meat, fish and seafood, processed vegetables, fruit and vegetable preserves and dried fruits; bamboo shoots, bean curd, coconut milk, processed ginko nuts, dried mushrooms, edible oils and fats; processed, flaked and prepared coconut; seasoned cooking oils; seasoned vegetables; cooked mushrooms; processed edible seeds; processed nuts; cooked, pickled and dried fruits and vegetables; soy-based beverages used as milk substitutes; tofu; processed bean sprouts; processed water chestnuts; soups; soup pre-packaged in serving-size cups; soup mixes, soup mixes containing noodles; packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; dried shrimp; shrimp pasteACTIVE
030staple foods, namely, cooked, pickled and dried chili peppers; mustards, spices, sauces excluding apple and cranberry sauces, vinegar, loose teas, tea bags, biscuits, crackers, cookies; flavored noodles and tempura batter mix; oriental noodles; noodles with oriental sauce; packaged noodles; dried herbs and spices; spice powders; seasoning blends; soy sauces; dried ginger; crystallized ginger; seasoning pastes; cooking sauces, namely, barbecue, oyster, hoisin, kung pao, stir fry, lemon, fish, soybean, black bean, peanut, and chili sauces; condiments, namely, plum sauce, mustards, sweet and sour sauce, duck sauce, and salad dressings; rice and rice blends; tea; packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; salads consisting primarily of pasta or riceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Oct 28, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Oct 28, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 6, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 6, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 6, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 6, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 7, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 6, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 28, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 7, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance