Drawing for PACKAGING TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

USPTO serial 76155440

PACKAGING TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACKAGING TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHILLIP M. CUNNINGHAM

PHILLIP M CUNNINGHAM712 12TH STSACRAMENTO, CA 95814-1909UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007PACKAGING MACHINESACTIVEFeb 17, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance