USPTO serial 76156148
GUS.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUS.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clement Cheng
GUS NETWORKS428 CLOVERLEAF DRBALDWIN PARK, CA 91706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Internet Service Provider Services featuring dial up service, DSL, server collocation services, web hosting, IP Telephony services, Virtual Private Network services Frame Relay services | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |