USPTO serial 76156151
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Bala Cynwyd, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SAUL H KRENZEL
SAUL H KRENZEL SAUL H KRENZEL & ASSOCTHE ROBINSON BLDG42 S 15TH ST STE 800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-2204| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES NAMELY PROVIDING LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |