USPTO serial 76156352
DETECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DETECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIE A. KATZ
BRIDGET K BUTWIN DEPAUL UNIVERSITYGENERAL COUNSEL 1 E JACKSON BLVD22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consultation services in the field of start-up high technology businesses; consultation in the field of human resources and employee recruitment | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | leasing office space to entrepreneurs to establish start-up high technology businesses; providing consultation in start-up funding and loan financing for startup high technology businesses | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | consultation services provided to start-up high technology businesses in the fields of computer/Internet access, high bandwidth connectivity, and telecommunications equipment and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services in the nature of seminars in the field of start-up high technology businesses, namely the needs and requirements of high technology businesses, namely, computer/Internet access, high bandwidth connectivity, telecommunications equipment and services, biotechnology research and resources, computer software and hardware, electronics research and equipment, loan financing, start-up funding, employee recruitment, human resources, industry updates, and personnel partnering and networking | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consultation services provided to start-up high technology businesses in the fields of biotechnology research, computer software and hardware, and electronics research | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DePaul University
- Other trademarks owned by DePaul University
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DETECH
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |