Drawing for STRATEGIC RESOURCE

USPTO serial 76156390

STRATEGIC RESOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRATEGIC RESOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore A. Breiner

THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER115 N HENRY STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT SERVICES; PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH PERSONNEL FOR THE MANAGEMENT, CONSTRUCTION, PROGRAMMING OR OPERATION OF COMPUTERS; CONSULTATION WITH RESPECT TO THE RECRUITMENT OF PERSONNEL; COUNSELING WITH RESPECT TO THE SEEKING OF EMPLOYMENTACTIVE
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS AND CONFERENCES FOR THE PERSONNEL OF OTHERS IN THE AREAS OF RECRUITMENT, HUMAN RESOURCES AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENTACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Nov 3, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Nov 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 31, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 10, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 10, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 7, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 7, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 12, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 13, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 18, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 12, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 9, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance