USPTO serial 76156479
TSAI TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TSAI TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toulouse, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leon Medzhibovsky
LEON MEDZHIBOVSKY FULBRIGHT JAWORSKI666 5TH AVE FL 30NEW YORK, NY 10103-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | water proofing, water-repelling, oil-proofing, and oil-repelling chemical compositions for use in the treatment of materials in the nature of textiles, paper, cardboard, wood, glass, siliceous and cellulosic materials and organic substances | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, ISDN services, personal communication services, air time brokerage, gateway services for residential and commercial customers | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | waterproofing, water-repelling, oil-proofing and oil-repelling of materials in the nature of textiles, paper, cardboard, wood, glass, siliceous and cellulosic materials and organic substances, for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |