USPTO serial 76156654
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Great Neck, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Klugman
ROBERT KLUGMAN JASPAN SCHLESINGER HOFFMAN LLP300 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530-3302UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 1983 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |