Drawing for SUTTON & FOSTER

USPTO serial 76156712

SUTTON & FOSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUTTON & FOSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John I OMalley

JOHN I OMALLEY VOLPE AND KOENIG PCUNITED PLZ STE 160030 S 17TH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Toilet articles and articles for the body and beauty care, namely bath and shower gels, body cleansers, skin soaps, hand soaps, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, body lotions, skin creams, shaving creams, and shaving lotions; and oral care kit comprised of toothpaste, mouthwash, dental floss, and toothbrushACTIVE
021Dispensers for bath, body, and beauty products, namely, skin creams, shampoos, body cleansers, shower gels, hand soaps, and hair setting lotionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 11, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 6, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 6, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 1, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 1, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance