Drawing for ARTIFICIAL IMMUNE SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 76156960

ARTIFICIAL IMMUNE SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARTIFICIAL IMMUNE SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angelo Notaro

ANGELO NOTARO NOTARO & MICHALOS PCEMPIRE STATE BLDG350 FIFTH AVE STE 6902NEW YORK, NY 10118-6985

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded electronic, magnetic, biological, optical data-carriers containing adaptive algorithms for use in computers and in computer networks; computer programs, software for use in virtual security applications, in physical security applications, in artificial intelligence applications, in electronic alarm systems, in access control systems, for fault detection in complex (virtual and physical) systems, for cryptography; electronic and optical security and surveillance equipment and software; electronic access control systems; electronic alarm and warning systems; software for computer virus-detection and-suppressionACTIVE
016Books, newsletters, magazines, manuals, study booksACTIVE
042Research and development as well as consultancy in the field of information technology, adaptive algorithms, artificial intelligence, virus detection and suppression, physical security, virtual security, fault detection in complex systems, access control, biometric verification, alarm and surveillance systems, warning systems, cryptography, robotics, domotics; computer programming for others; design and implementation of software security services; computer-virus detection and suppression services; access (to physical and virtual systems) control servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance