USPTO serial 76156970
FOUNDATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2003
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FOUNDATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LUTON, BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
LUTON, BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 1TD, GB
Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 1TD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig A. Fieschko
Craig A. Fieschko DeWitt Ross & Stevens SC2 E. Mifflin St., 6th FloorMadison, WI 53703-2865UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HUNTLEIGH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by HUNTLEIGH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Huntleigh Technology PLC
- Other trademarks owned by Huntleigh Technology PLC
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named FOUNDATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |