Drawing for SILEX

USPTO serial 76157195

SILEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karol A. Kepchar

KAROL A KEPCHAR AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP1676 INTERNATIONAL DRMCLEAN, VA 22102-4832UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Food and beverage cooking and processing appliances, namely electric coffee grinders, electric meat grinders, electric juicers, electric juice extractors, electric blenders, electric drink mixers, electric food mixers, electric food processors, electric hand blenders, electric hand mixers, electric stand mixers, electric flatbread makers, electric food choppers, knife sharpening machines, electric knives, electric can openers and electric scissorsACTIVE
009Clothes irons, namely electric clothes irons and their component parts, steam irons and travel iron products, namely travel clothes irons, foreign voltage converter and adaptor sets and clothes steamersACTIVE
011Electric toasters, toaster ovens, electric roaster ovens, electric sandwich makers, electric coffeemakers, electric coffeemakers and carafes sold together as a unit, electric coffeemarker/grinders, electric cookers, electric pots and pans, electric kettles, electric hot pots, electric grills, electric griddles, electric skillet/griddles, electric slow food cookers, electric oven broilers, electric waffle bakers and electric waffle bakers/sandwich grillsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 7, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 16, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 13, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance