Drawing for VENDING.COM

USPTO serial 76157266

VENDING.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VENDING.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karol A. Kepchar

KAROL A KEPCHAR COMMERCEAKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLP2005 MARKET ST STE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7042

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in vending management, namely, the collection, processing and dissemination of sales, service and inventory data from vending machinesACTIVEJul 25, 2001
035administering a referral rewards program provided over global computer networks; vending services, namely, the collection, processing and dissemination for others of sales, service and inventory data from vending machines; business consultation, technical assistance and management in the establishment, operation and maintenance of vending machines and vending businessesACTIVEJul 25, 2001
037vending services, namely the installation, maintenance, service and repair of vending machinesACTIVEJul 25, 2001
042providing information on the subject of vending and vending management over a global computer information network; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider (ASP), to host and deliver, via a global computer information network, a network-based suite of computer applications in the field of vending and vending managementACTIVEJul 25, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 25, 2002CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED
Jan 7, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 24, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Oct 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance