USPTO serial 76157416
ECOFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOFACTURING TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP
Tokyo, JP
Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yoichiro Yamaguchi
YOICHIRO YAMAGUCHI RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLCLION BLDG1233 20TH ST STE 501WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | cement mixes produced from industrial or home waste; asphalt; goods made from asphalt, namely hot-in-place recycled asphalt by using hot air other than direct heating | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | environmental management services, namely reviewing standards and practices for others to assure compliance with environment laws and regulations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hosokawa, Hisashi
- Other trademarks owned by Hosokawa, Hisashi
- Other trademarks owned by Taniguchi, Masatsugu
- Other trademarks owned by Taniguchi, Masatsugu
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ECOFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |