Drawing for VIDEOCORE

USPTO serial 76157433

VIDEOCORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEOCORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William M Lee Jr

WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE MANN SMITH MCWILLIAMS SWEENEY & OHLSP O BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRONIC SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, MICROPROCESSORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR THE RECEPTION, PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF SOUND, VISION, AND OTHER SIGNALS; ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS, NAMELY, MICROPROCESSORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS FOR PROVIDING AN INTERFACE BETWEEN SOUND, VISION, AND OTHER SIGNAL SOURCES; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, CAMERAS AND TELEVISION CAMERAS FOR THE GENERATION OF VISION SIGNALS; AND COMPONENT PARTS AND ACCESSORIES FOR THE FOREGOING GOODS, NAMELY, ENCODED PROGRAMS AND DATA CARRIERS PRERECORDED WITH ENCODED PROGRAMSACTIVE
042TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF GENERATION, RECEPTION, TRANSMISSION AND PROCESSING OF SOUND, VISION, AND OTHER SIGNALS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR THE GENERATION, RECEPTION, TRANSMISSION, AND PROCESSING OF SOUND, VISION AND OTHER SIGNALS FOR OTHERS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, MICROPROCESSORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR USE WITH INTERFACES BETWEEN SOUND, VISION, AND OTHER SIGNALS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, CAMERAS AND TELEVISION CAMERAS FOR THE GENERATION OF VISION SIGNALS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENCODED PROGRAMS FOR OTHERS FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING; PREPARATION OF REPORTS AND PROVISION OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION RELATING TO ALL OF THE FOREGOINGACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2005PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED
Nov 4, 2004PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 30, 2004PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Jul 30, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 14, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance