USPTO serial 76157719
IE-FLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IE-FLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TOKYO 101, JP
TOKYO, JP
Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM A STREFF JR
WILLIAM A STREFF, JR PC KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP200 E RANDOLPH ST STE 5300CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | semiconductor products and optoelectronic devices, namely, transistors, light emitting diodes and integrated circuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RENESAS TECHNOLOGY CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by RENESAS TECHNOLOGY CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Hitachi Seisakusho
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IE-FLASH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |