USPTO serial 76157815
ALLIANCE FIBER OPTIC PRODUCTS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2003
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ALLIANCE FIBER OPTIC PRODUCTS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc.
Milpitas, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc.
Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc.
Sunnyvale, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc.
Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc.
Sunnyvale, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc.
CORNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
WILMINGTON, DE, US
Other trademarks owned by CORNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan T. Hardee
Ryan T. Hardee Corning IncorporatedOne Riverfront PlazaSullivan Park TI-3-1Corning, NY 14831Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | fiber optic signal branching/splitting devices for use in telecom, datacom, and broadband communication services, namely, fiber optic cables, cable assemblies, connectors, couplers, switches, attenuators, multiplexers and demultiplexers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CORNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ALLIANCE FIBER OPTIC PRODUCTS, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 6, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 6, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 12, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 12, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |