Drawing for CAMPITROTI

USPTO serial 76158115

CAMPITROTI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CAMPITROTI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E Abhlman

LAWRENCE E ABHLMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines, spirits and liquorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 16, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Nov 28, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 24, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 24, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 14, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 14, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Feb 22, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 4, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 10, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Sep 8, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 20, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 29, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 30, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 7, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance