USPTO serial 76158523
REFLEXIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REFLEXIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gloucester, Ontario K1J 9B9, CA
ONTARIO K1J 9BP, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A Smith
JEFFREY A SMITH COHEN SMITH & WHITEMILLEN WHITE ZELANO 7 BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CROSS-PLATFORM GRAPHIC RENDITION ENGINE FOR USE IN COMPUTER SOFTWARE, FIRMWARE AND HARDWARE APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |