USPTO serial 76159268
HAPPY TREE FRIENDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAPPY TREE FRIENDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S RODEN
DEIRDRE O'MALLEY MONDO MEDIA444 DE HARO ST STE 201SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment and animation production services, namely, producing an animated cartoon series featured on a web site on the Internet | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |