USPTO serial 76159275
BRAVO!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAVO!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS A REYNOLDS
THOMAS A REYNOLDS REYNOLDS LAW FIRM340 MAIN ST STE 910WORCESTER, MA 01608-1694UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |