USPTO serial 76159426
THE CAKE MIX DOCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2790131Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 9, 2003
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE CAKE MIX DOCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nashville, TN
Nashville, TN
Nashville, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver R. Chernin
Oliver R. Chernin McLaughlin & Stern, LLP260 Madison AvenueNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | SERIES OF NONFICTION BOOKS, NAMELY, RECIPE BOOKS CONTAINING DESSERT AND CONFECTION PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 1999 |
| 042 | PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF DESSERTS AND CONFECTIONS PREPARATIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |