USPTO serial 76159890
E-ACCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-ACCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirk M. Hartung
KIRK M HARTUNG ZARLEY MCKEE THOMTE VOORHEESGRAND801 GRAND AVE STE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2721Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LATCHES AND HANDLES HAVING ELECTRONIC LOCKS FOR VEHICULAR APPLICATIONS, NAMELY AGRICULTURAL AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, MOTOR HOMES, TRAVEL TRAILERS, UTILITY AND SERVICE TRUCKS, AMBULANCE AND FIRE TRUCKS, BUS AND MOTOR COACHES, LIGHT/MEDIUM/HEAVY DUTY TRUCKS, PICK-UP TRUCK; TOPPERS/COVERS/TOOLBOXES, OFF-ROAD UTILITY VEHICLES NAMELY, ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES, LAWN TRACTORS AND GOLF CARS AND INDUSTRIAL CABINETS AND ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS THAT HOUSE AND PROTECT ELECTRICAL, DATA COMMUNICATIONS, INSTRUMENTS AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | Nov 26, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |