USPTO serial 76159941
BODYGUARD INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COREA, ANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BODYGUARD INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Graham Beene
H GRAHAM BEENE BURR & FORMAN LLP20TH420 20TH ST N STE 3100BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203-5206Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting classes in the field of scrutiny, investigative services, modern weapons, and law enforcement, military, and security tactics; and distributing written publications, training course materials, videotapes, manuals in connection therewith | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1996 |
| 042 | Personal and institutional security services and private investigative services, namely global risk assessment, threat management, travel security planning, executive protection consultation, surveillance, criminal activity investigation, fraud investigation, extortion investigation, sabotage and espionage investigation, insurance fraud investigation, fraud investigation, and fidelity investigation involving employee honesty and integrity | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |