USPTO serial 76160032
STRUCTURE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STRUCTURE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHERYL A WITHYCOMBE
CHERYL A WITHYCOMBE BAKER & MCKENZIE101 W BROADWAY 12TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND BUSINESS CONSULTATION IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING COURSES, CLASSES, WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING, CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS, INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL, OR IN PERSON; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION FOR OTHERS; CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE, WEB DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, WEB PORTALS, CUSTOM APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT, AND WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cotelligent, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cotelligent, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STRUCTURE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |