USPTO serial 76160097
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ZANICA (BERGAMO), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT DUBNO
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS P5676 RIVERDALE AVE # 900BRONX, NY 10471-2138UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal hooks, metal shackles, metal rings, cable linkages of metal, metal couplings for use with metal tubes, metal plugs, metal expansion setting plug for mould, metal threaded rods, metal threaded rods with handles, metal threaded rods with handle and wingnut, metal screws, metal expansion fixing equipment for mould, metal expansion fixing equipment for mould with magnetic spacer disk, metal expansion fixing equipment with threaded rod; | ACTIVE | Jun 9, 1999 |
| 007 | lifting systems for lifting precast concrete elements, couplings other than for land vehicles, lifting ring clutches, lifting anchors, lifting tubes, anchor lifting systems with base plate, anchor lifting systems for demolding, mould fixing system for wood form, demolding keys; | ACTIVE | Jun 9, 1999 |
| 019 | concrete, concrete beams; concrete building materials, namely-- blocks, bricks, posts, slabs, panels | ACTIVE | Jun 9, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |