USPTO serial 76160333
CALIENTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CALIENTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D Peter Hochberg
D PETER HOCHBERG D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPA1940 EAST 6TH ST 6TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed beef and processed pork, namely, keilbassa, Kolbassa coil, Polish coil, Goettinger sausage, Tyroler sausage, bierwurst sausage, jagdwurst sausage, Kolbassa sausage, Lyona sausage, mortadella sausage, pimento sausage, blood and tongue sausage, salami sausage, village sausage, pork and tongue sausage, Gelbwurst; Speckwurst, Black Forest ham, shaving ham, Virginia style ham, smoked honey style ham, ham with pepper, stuffed ham, cooked ham, Bierschinken, headcheese, bologna, beef bologna, luncheon loaf, all beef salami, baked minced ham and cheese loaf; bake meat, olive and pimento loaf; baked meat and mushroom loaf, bake meat and pepper loaf, baked luncheon loaf, baked meat loaf, Dutch meat loaf, baked Bavarian meat loaf, bung bologna smoked sausage link, knockwursts, wieners, debreciner and paprika sausage, pepperoni, weisswurst Muencheners, fresh bratwurst, Italian sausage links, liver sausage, liver sausage chubs, corned beef, pastrami, pastrami eye, roast pork, roast beef, smoked boneless pork loin, smoked pork loin, smoked whole butts, smoked pork ham hocks, double smoke layer bacon, smoked Bauch Speckwurst, rolled bacon, rolled bacon with black peppers, Irish bacon, real bacon bits, Black Forest salami, Cervelat salami, Hungarian salami, peppercorn salami, mustardseed salami, Farmers salami, dry Summer salami, Vienna salami, Westphalian salami, London broil spice salami, layer bacon, fully cooked layer bacon, fully cooked side bacon, sliced round bacon, diced back bacon, diced ham, sliced sandwich ham, honey baked ham, Bavarian smoked ham, stuffed ham roast, dinner ham and half skin bone-in smoked ham | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |