USPTO serial 76160373
KANGAROO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KANGAROO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOUIS M. HEIDELBERGER
LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER RED SMITH LLP2500 ONE LIBERTY PLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES,NAMELY, PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS ACCESSED BY TELEPHONE, CABLE, SATELLITE, WIRELESS, HANDHELD DEVICES AND THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, LOCAL, LONG DISTANCE AND INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO, ADVERTISING, GAMING, AND GRAPHICS, BY MEANS OF, TELEPHONE, CABLE, SATELLITE, WIRELESS AND HANDHELD DEVICES AND THE INTERNET; PROVIDING ACCESS TO DIRECTORY SERVICES BY TELEPHONE, CABLE, SATELLITE, WIRELESS, HANDHELD DEVICES AND THE INTERNET; ELECTRONIC MAIL AND VOICE MESSAGING SERVICES, NAMELY, RECORDING,STORAGE AND SUBSEQUENT TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES BY TELEPHONE, CABLE, SATELLITE, WIRELESS HANDHELD DEVICES AND THE INTERNET; COMPUTER AIDED TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES; TRANSMITTING STREAMED SOUND AND AUDIO-VISUAL RECORDINGS VIA THE INTERNET; PAGING SERVICES; COMMUNICATION EXCHANGE SERVICES BY TELEPHONE, CABLE, SATELLITE, WIRELESS, HANDHELD DEVICES AND THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ONLINE SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED WEB PAGES AND REGULAR EMAIL UPDATES FEATURING USER-DEFINED INFORMATION,USING SEARCH ENGINES AND WEBLINKS TO ONLINE MEDIA FEATURING NEWS, TRAFFIC, TECHNOLOGY, SCIENCES, HEALTH, FITNESS, FASHION, BUSINESS, FINANCE, ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT, FAMILY, HOME AND GARDEN, SPORTS, TRAVEL, CURRENT EVENTS, REFERENCE MATERIALS, AND RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |